ALERTS!!!!

“The number of children and grandchildren with cancer in their bones, with leukemia in their blood, or with poison in their lungs might seem statistically small to some, in comparison with natural health hazards. But this is not a natural health hazard—and it is not a statistical issue. The loss of even one human life, or the malformation of even one baby—who may be born long after we are gone—should be of concern to us all. Our children and grandchildren are not merely statistics toward which we can be indifferent.”

John F. Kennedy, July 26th, 1963

Monday, February 3, 2014

Japanese radio commentator quits after being told to shut up about Fukushima nuclear plant

FROM: STRAIGHT.COM

JAPANESE PRIME MINISTER   Shinzo Abe has claimed that the problems at the Fukushima power plant are under control.
But stories keep percolating out of the country raising questions about the state of the nuclear reactors in the area crippled by a March 2011 earthquake and tsunami.
Russia Today has reported that a commentator on Japan's Radio 1 resigned after he was instructed not to discuss the nuclear accident until after a gubernatorial election.
And this commentator, Toru Nakakita, is an economics professor at the University of Toyo in Tokyo.
Nakakita quit as a result of the censorship order.

Fukushima Nuclear Crisis Update for January 21st to January 28th, 2014

FROM: GREENPEACE

Here’s the latest of our news bulletins from the ongoing crisis at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.
State of the Fukushima Reactors
Video of leak can be seen here. According to Nuclear Engineering International:
A sample of the water showed contamination levels of 24,000 Bq/cm3 of all beta radiation, 1700 Bq/cm3 of caesium-137, 700 Bq/cm3 of caesium-134 and 25 Bq/cm3 of cobalt-60.
TEPCO is conducting investigations but is not able to say how long the leak has been happening and how much water has escaped.
Meanwhile, researchers from Tokyo Metropolitan University and High Energy Accelerator Research Organization have developed a way of taking images of the melted nuclear fuel inside the damaged Fukushima reactors using cosmic rays. The team successfully tested the system at the idle Tokai nuclear power plant. The system uses elementary particles called muons which change behavior when in contact with nuclear fuel. “The (cosmic ray) measurement system can be installed easily. We are ready to use it at the Fukushima No. 1 plant if Tepco cooperates,” Hidekazu Kakuno, an associate professor from TokyoMetropolitanUniversity.
The work continues to remove nuclear fuel from the storage pool in the unstable reactor #4 building and place it in a more secure location. As of January 27, 220 of the 1,533 fuel assembles have been transferred.
TEPCO
In October 2011 TEPCO began demanding its workers who had been evacuated because of the nuclear disaster suspend their claims for compensation, an investigation by Japan’s Mainichi Shimbun newspaper has found.  The sheer number of applications from the other victims of the crisis was the reason given. In spring 2013 the newspaper discovered the company was demanding any compensation already paid to its workers be refunded. Workers who have been transferred by TEPCO to posts away from home or have left Fukushima are also being denied compensation. "If this life we're leading now isn't a refugee existence, then what is it?" said one employee.

Boxer: ‘Unacceptable delay’ in U.S. Fukushima response

FROM: THE HILL

Regulators are moving too slowly to safeguard nuclear reactors in the West against earthquakes in light of the 2011 Fukushima meltdown in Japan, the chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee said Thursday. 

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) pressed the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to hasten its review of seismic risks near reactors in her home state and across the western United States. 

The NRC evaluation process has taken nearly three years, and the agency has allowed for an additional three years for more analysis in the event that threats are detected, Boxer argued Thursday. 

“This is an unacceptable delay — earthquakes will not wait until after the paperwork has been completed,” she said during opening remarks at a hearing on the issue. 

The magnitude 9.0 earthquake that rattled the plant at Fukushima knocked out electric power to the entire facility. Backup onsite diesel generators were wiped out a short time later when a powerful tsunami caused by the earthquake hammered the Japanese coast

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/196987-boxer-unacceptable-delay-in-us-fukushima-response#ixzz2sJmcKkAC
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook

Debris clearance at Fukushima

FROM: WORLD NUCLEAR NEWS

A series of photographs showing progress in the removal of tsunami debris from the damaged Fukushima Daiichi plant has been released by Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco).
The first tsunami waves breached sea defences at Fukushima Daiichi about one hour after the magnitude 9.0 earthquake struck on 11 March 2011. Later waves completely overwhelmed the power plant's sea front, carrying debris including cars into the site.
While debris was quickly cleared from roads and paths to allow workers to access the site to help in stabilizing the damaged reactors, much of the debris remained untouched.
Tepco's latest photos show how the removal of debris - including cars, trucks and building materials - was successfully completed in some areas of the plant adjacent to the sea.

Fukushima Reinforces Worst Fears for Japanese Who Are Anti-Nuclear PowerAnd we’re joined by Arjun Makhijani, an engineer — engineer specializing in nuclear fusion. He’s the president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research. And Kenji Kushida, research associate in Japanese studies at Stanford University. Well, Arjun Makhijani, let me start with you. Translate for us first to bring us up to date. What exactly is the problem now and how serious is it?

FROM: PBS NEWSHOUR

And we’re joined by Arjun Makhijani, an engineer — engineer specializing in nuclear fusion. He’s the president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research. And Kenji Kushida, research associate in Japanese studies at Stanford University.
Well, Arjun Makhijani, let me start with you. Translate for us first to bring us up to date. What exactly is the problem now and how serious is it?

ARJUN MAKHIJANI, Institute for Energy and Environmental Research: So there are a couple of different problems. One of the problems is what they have found in the groundwater and what actually is there.
So, so far, we have been concerned about an element called cesium, cesium 137 and 134, which is radioactive. But now they have found strontium-90, which is much more dangerous, at levels that are 30 times more than cesium. So to give you an idea of the level of contamination, if somebody drank that water for a year, they would almost certainly get cancer. So it’s very contaminated.
So that’s one problem. The other is the defenses to hold back this water from the sea seem to be overcome. So now the contaminated waters, 70,000, 80,000 gallons is flowing into the sea every day.

TEPCO fears 3-cm hole in Fukushima reactor No.2

FROM: RT

The suppression pool of the Fukushima Daiichi Unit No. 2 reactor may have a 3-centimeter hole in it, through which the highly radioactive water might be leaking out, the plant operator said.
The information is based on the data gathered by a robot sent into the suppression pool at the bottom of the No. 2 reactor's primary containment vessel earlier in January. The received video images indicated that the structure was damaged somewhere.
Plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO) estimated the damaged area could be 8 to 9 square centimeters in size. If it were a hole, it is predicted to be between 3.2 and 3.6 centimeters in diameter.

50 Reasons We Should Fear the Worst from Fukushima

FROM: GLOBAL RESEARCH

[This is the first in a two part series]
Fukushima’s missing melted cores and radioactive gushers continue to fester in secret.
Japan’s harsh dictatorial censorship has been matched by aglobal corporate media blackout aimed—successfully—at keeping Fukushima out of the public eye.
But that doesn’t keep the actual radiation out of our ecosystem, our markets … or our bodies.
Speculation on the ultimate impact ranges from the utterly harmless to the intensely apocalyptic .
But the basic reality is simple: for seven decades, government Bomb factories and privately-owned reactors have spewed massive quantities of unmonitored radiation into the biosphere.
The impacts of these emissions on human and ecological health are unknown primarily because the nuclear industry has resolutely refused to study them.
Indeed, the official presumption has always been that showing proof of damage from nuclear Bomb tests and commercial reactors falls to the victims, not the perpetrators.
And that in any case, the industry will be held virtually harmless.
This “see no evil, pay no damages” mindset dates from the Bombing of Hiroshima to Fukushima to the disaster coming next … which could be happening as you read this.

Saturday, February 1, 2014

DearJon: Fukushima Fallout Concerns on the Central Coast

FROM: KION 46 TV

I continue to follow up on the potential for fallout from Fukushima, Japan, two years after the massive earthquake and tsunami that caused a meltdown of three reactors there. This is a two-part Dear Jon, so let's get to question for part one. Scott messaged me on Facebook and asked, "Why is there no information readily available on the real-time radiation levels and/or impacts to the West Coast? The government reports on everything, why not this imperceptible danger?"

The government agency to warn us about radiation in the air, land and water is the Environmental Protection Agency. It has what it calls 'RADNET' monitors around the country and acceptable radiation standards in place.
Dan Hirsch, a University of California Santa Cruz lecturer and radiation watchdog for more than 40 years, tells me that science has now shown the dangers from radiation are actually greater than once thought and now the EPA wants to lower its acceptable standards for what's safe. He finds that troubling.
That being said, last week we showed you a video of a guy on the beach in Half Moon Bay getting high radiation levels at that location. The video went viral and bloggers speculated this could be from Fukushima and really ratcheted up the fear for many on the central coast.
After further study of sand on the beach in Half Moon Bay, researchers have found thorium and radium which could be naturally forming sources of radiation there.
Hirsch says that if the radiation were from Fukushima, researchers would have found Cesium 137, a dangerous and long-lasting substance from radiation fallout. The half life of Cesium 137 is 30 years, so researchers would continue to see readings in 2041 and 30 years beyond that.
Cesium 137 was not found, so researchers say there's no link to Fukushima. That's what science does for you, according to Hirsch: test for substances and reveals the truth.

Dear Jon: Fukashima fallout concerns on the Central Coast, Part 2

FROM: KION 46 TV

As a member of our Center for Investigative Action team I’ve been looking into the possibility of Fukashima fallout here on the West Coast. You’ve sent a lot of mail to me on the topic. Recent reports have also surfaced about radiation impacts to the Central Coast. In part two, I’ll show you how terribly the EPA’s RADnet monitors failed the Central Coast at the very time of the emergency in March/April 2011.

In part one, I told you that the Environmental Protection Agency is supposed to be the government's lead watchdog for monitoring air quality. In March and April, at the height of the Fukashima emergency, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Department of Energy were taking a lead role in the U.S. Government’s response to the impacts to our shores.
University of California Santa Cruz lecturer Dan Hirsch has been a radiation expert for over 40 years and said the EPA was getting usurped by these agencies. He said that was the first sign something was strange at the top of the response chain.
Beyond that, Hirsch warns that before there’s a rush to judgment over Fukashima fallout, do the science first. He maintains the radiation effects to us through eating fish are minimal -- maybe one in 100,000 cases.
In the days and weeks after the Fukashima meltdown in March of 2011, the EPA's reporting of radiation here on the central coast was sorely lacking, according to Hirsch.
3 photos that Hirsch shared tell this part of the story and are attached here. This Washington Post map shows the suspected path of the radioactive plume from Fukashima. Notice the plum was to hit on the central coast between San Francisco and Los Angeles in mid-March and April of 2011.
Now look at the map of the West Coast. The EPA has what they call "RADnet monitors." These test the air quality for radiation. The blue dots are the functional monitors at the time of the Fukashima accident.
The light blue dots are monitors that aren't working.

Firms that made No. 1 plant sued

FROM: JAPAN TIMES


1,400 plaintiffs want Toshiba, GE, Hitachi blamed for meltdowns

Some 1,400 people have filed a joint lawsuit against three companies that manufactured the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant, saying they should be financially liable for damage caused by its 2011 meltdowns.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs said that the lawsuit, filed Thursday at the Tokyo District Court, is a landmark challenge of current regulations that give manufacturers immunity from liability in nuclear accidents.
Under the nuclear damages compensation scheme, only plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Co. has been held responsible for the crisis.
The plaintiffs, which include 38 Fukushima residents and nearly 400 others from around the world, argue that Toshiba, GE and Hitachi failed to make needed safety improvements to the four-decade-old reactors at the Fukushima plant. They are seeking compensation of ¥100 each, saying the idea is to raise awareness of the problem.
All three companies declined comment on the lawsuit.

(FULL ARTICLE---LINK)

Fukushima effects

FROM: DAVID SUZUKI FOUNDATION

An Internet search turns up an astounding number of pages about radiation from Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant meltdown that followed an earthquake and tsunami in March 2011. But it's difficult to find credible information.

One reason is that government monitoring of radiation and its effects on fish stocks appears to be limited. According to the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, "No U.S.government or international agency is monitoring the spread of low levels of radiation from Fukushima along the West Coast of North America and around the Hawaiian Islands."

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's most recent food testing, which includes seafood, appears to be from June 2012. Its website states, "FDA has no evidence that radionuclides from the Fukushima incident are present in the U.S. food supply at levels that would pose a public health concern. This is true for both FDA-regulated food products imported from Japan and U.S. domestic food products, including seafood caught off the coast of the United States."

The non-profit Canadian Highly Migratory Species Foundation has been monitoring Pacific troll-caught albacore tuna off the B.C. coast. Its 2013 sampling found "no residues detected at the lowest detection limits achievable." The B.C. Centre for Disease Control website assures us we have little cause for concern about radiation from Japan in our food and environment. Websites for Health Canada and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency yield scant information.

But the disaster isn't over. Despite the Japanese government's claim that everything is under control, concerns have been raised about the delicate process of removing more than 1,500 nuclear fuel rod sets, each containing 60 to 80 fuel rods with a total of about 400 tonnes of uranium, from Reactor 4 to a safer location, which is expected to take a year. Some, including me, have speculated another major earthquake could spark a new disaster. And Reactors 1, 2 and 3 still have tonnes of molten radioactive fuel that must be cooled with a constant flow of water.

A radioactive plume is expected to reach the West Coast sometime this year, but experts say it will be diluted by currents off Japan's east coast and, according to the Live Science website, "the majority of the cesium-137 will remain in the North Pacific gyre — a region of ocean that circulates slowly clockwise and has trapped debris in its center to form the 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch' — and continue to be diluted for approximately a decade following the initial Fukushima release in 2011."

With the lack of data from government, the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution is asking the public for help. In January, Ken Buesseler, senior scientist and director of the Center for Marine and Environmental Radioactivity at the U.S.-based non-profit, launched a fundraising campaign and citizen science website to collect and analyze seawater along North America's West Coast.

"Whether you agree with predictions that levels of radiation along the Pacific Coast of North America will be too low to be of human health concern or to impact fisheries and marine life, we can all agree that radiation should be monitored, and we are asking for your help to make that happen," Buesseler said in a news release.

(FULL ARTICLE---LINK)

Concerns Raised Over Lack Of Radiation Checks On Shipments

FROM: TRIBUNE 242

THE BAHAMAS Customs Department does not test cargo shipments for radiation contamination, Comptroller Charles Turner confirmed yesterday.
Following reports last week that Jamaican Customs authorities have recorded ‘higher-than-normal’ levels of radiation in two shipments from Japan, Mr Turner said he was “not aware of any checks being undertaken in the Bahamas”.
According to The Gleaner, Jamaica Customs Agency has been on “high alert” since the March 2011 earthquake-triggered meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan.

Sludge designated radioactive waste for 1st time in Kanagawa

FROM: THE ASAHI SHIMBUM

The Environment Ministry has classified 2.9 tons of sludge from Kanagawa Prefecture as radioactive waste derived from the Fukushima nuclear disaster, the first such designation for the prefecture on the southern border of Tokyo.
The designation, made in December, means the ministry is responsible for disposing of the radioactive sludge.
The ministry on Jan. 31 stopped short of disclosing the origins of the waste, but Yokohama city government officials said the designation covers sludge from rain collection and storage facilities at 17 municipal elementary, junior high and other schools.
The city applied for the designation of the sludge as radioactive waste in September.
The designation also included sludge collected from roadside ditches and elsewhere, for which the city had filed similar applications, the city government officials added.
Waste containing more than 8,000 becquerels of radioactive cesium, spewed from the crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant, per kilogram is eligible for the designation.
A total of 140,000 tons had been designated by the end of 2013 from Tokyo and 11 prefectures, including Kanagawa.

Concentration of Strontium-90 at Selected Hot Spots in Japan

FROM: PLOS ONE

Introduction
In the course of the Fukushima nuclear accident, large amounts of volatile radionuclides were released into the environment. In particular, the radioisotopes of xenon, krypton, iodine (especially 131I), cesium (especially 134Cs and 137Cs), and tellurium are regarded as the most relevant ones, which caused partly significant contamination of the Japanese land surface[1][3] and the Pacific Ocean [4][9]. These radionuclides were monitored globally in various environmental media, see e.g. [10][16]. Few studies also indicated the release of low amounts of less volatile radionuclides, such as 59Fe, 95Nb, 140Ba, 140La, 239Np and many others [17].
What all the above mentioned radionuclides have in common is that they are γ-emitters, which allows their straightforward detection and quantification using γ-spectrometry. The analysis of pure β -emitters, in contrast, requires greater efforts. This also refers to radiostrontium, in particular 90Sr (T1/2 = 28.90 yr). Due to its chemical similarity to calcium, 90Sr is accumulated in the bone and may cause leukemia or skeletal cancer. Its presence in the environment, therefore, causes much concern as it is often dictating risk of contaminated sites over longer periods of time and calls for the monitoring of this inconvenient radionuclide [18]. This is of great importance especially for ensuring food safety.

Apart from sea water [19], data base publications [20][21] and governmental and/or industrial analyses [22][24], hardly any data for 90Sr released during the Fukushima nuclear accident were published in peer-reviewed literature. Measurements of airborne radiostrontium have been conducted by European networks but did not reveal detectable activities that could be attributed unambiguously to the releases of the Fukushima nuclear accident (e.g. via the presence of short-lived 89Sr; T1/2 = 50.5 d) [12]. In some cases detectable levels of 90Sr were reported for seawater around the Korean Peninsula [25]. The present study is one of the first ones published in peer-reviewed English literature dedicated to the 90Sr contamination levels on the Japanese land surface.
(...)

Conclusions

Several hot spots in Japan were investigated with respect to the activity concentrations of β -emitting 90Sr and β/γ-emitting 134Cs and 137Cs in soil and vegetation samples. Although the137Cs activity levels were partly as high as in the kBq⋅g−1 range, the 90Sr contamination levels of any sample did not exceed the Bq⋅g−1 range. The radiocesium contamination could be clearly attributed to the Fukushima nuclear accident via its activity ratio fingerprint (134Cs/137Cs). Since short-lived 89Sr could no longer be determined, the source of the 90Sr theoretically could, in part, also be fallout from the nuclear explosions of the 20th century or previous nuclear acidents. In any case, it is likely that releases from the Fukushima nuclear accident contributed much of the 90Sr that was measured at the hot spots.
The low contamination levels confirmed previous simulations by Schwantes et al. [18], who predicted that most of the radiostrontium was retained inside the reactors. In fact, the 90Sr activity concentrations were partly four orders of magnitude lower than the respective 137Cs activity concentrations.
The data set (though limited in terms of sample numbers) suggests an intrinsic coexistence of137Cs and 90Sr in the contaminations caused by the Fukushima nuclear accident. This observation is of great importance for the current food monitoring campaigns, which currently rely on the assumption that the activity concentrations of β-emitting 90Sr (which is relatively laborious to determine) is not higher than 10% of the level of γ-emitting 137Cs (which can be measured quickly). This assumption could be confirmed for the samples investigated herein.

Global Green USA: The Future of Nuclear Energy, Chernobyl and Fukushima ...

Debris hinders decommissioning work at Fukushima nuclear plant

FROM: THE ASHAI SHIMBUM

The No. 4 reactor of the stricken Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant, where workers are removing spent nuclear fuel, is still a gutted shell and conditions there remain extremely hazardous.
The damage is extensive, with mangled debris seemingly everywhere.
A team of reporters from The Asahi Shimbun visited the site on Jan. 29.
Unlike the No. 1 to No. 3 reactors at the Fukushima facility, the No. 4 reactor did not experience a meltdown after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami.
The No. 4 reactor has seen the most decommissioning work of those four reactors as radiation levels there are much lower than in the other reactors.
This is because it was undergoing regular inspection when the disaster struck. Even so, an explosion occurred at the No. 4 reactor building around 6 a.m. on March 15, 2011. It was caused by hydrogen that had entered through piping from the No. 3 reactor, where a meltdown had occurred.
The explosion damaged the cooling equipment for the spent nuclear fuel storage pool, leading to global fears that the fuel would become exposed once the coolant had dried up.

Fukushima Watch: New Technology to Stop Deadly Strontium

FROM: THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

A new method to stop highly toxic radioactive strontium in ground water from flowing into the sea using American technology will start in February at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.
Among the radioactive materials that were dispersed at the site, the potentially lethal alkaline earth metal poses the biggest immediate concern, because, unlike cesium, it doesn’t get trapped in soil and tends to accumulate in bones of fish and animals if ingested.

Hundreds file lawsuit against makers of Fukushima nuclear plant

FROM: RT

About 1,400 people have filed a joint lawsuit against three companies that manufactured Japan's Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant, saying they should be financially liable for damage caused by its 2011 meltdowns.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs, who are seeking compensation of 100 yen ($1) each, say the lawsuit is meant to set a new legal precedent on current regulations, which give big corporations immunity from liability in the event of nuclear accidents.

The lawsuit was filed Thursday at the Tokyo District Court, AP reported.